Retaliation for the impeachment of Pesántez
Monday, January 10, 2011
Something Fun To Write In A Card
A year after the filing of impeachment against the prosecutor in charge, it remains clear that using the power of the prosecutor as the base passions of Washington Pesantez and as a means of protection or persecution. Some examples:
1. All officers of the Attorney who signed the statement of "support" to the head, thereby violating the Code of Judicial Function, were acquitted. Not fired anyone, and many of them have been awarded in the new "competition" of the prosecution. In all cases, the decisive score for the outcome, was the personal interview with Washington Pesantez.
2. Mr. Ángel Gabriel Salvador, which provided key information in the investigation and appeared as a witness in the trial was sued by Washington Pesántez, which filed a complaint against him for slander no serious injury, asking to apply the maximum penalty and the court determines the compensation for moral damages.
3. Bratislav Zivadinovic citizen who also appeared as witness at the trial (because Pesántez personally interfered in a case that involved him) has, as a direct result of his statements, 5 claims against it, demanded compensation totaling fifteen million dollars.
4. Dr. Lucy Blacio, former Attorney of El Oro, and a key witness in the investigation has been requested on several occasions to give a statement in a murder investigation. On the last occasion the prosecutor notifies the police request for Dr. Blacio be arrested and "forced" to appear.
During the investigation of the Assembly against Washington Pesántez, he said in an interview with the newspaper El Universo and threatens Blacio and reads "the dead, I will investigate this, because if an attack was okay, but can not draw a gun and kill" refers to the attack Pesántez that Dr. Blacio was victim when he was Provincial Prosecutor of El Oro, which was described by police as an attack and the shooter was a police sergeant in charge of protecting the officer. Reserved sources know that the prosecutor investigating the case under pressure to link Blacio instruction and ask for her detention.
5. On January 26, 2010 the House of Assembly urged to leave their office Pesántez as Attorney General for his unwarranted interference in the case had personal interests and their insults to the Legislative Branch. A few weeks ago we learned that that same day, Loja Prosecutor opens investigation against Mauricio Romo and Rita Rodriguez, the parents of Maria Paula Romo Assemblyman for complaint "received by the upper reserved" to investigate them for alleged illegal tax, unusual! SRI is not the one who asks the prosecution to investigate, but on the contrary, the prosecution asks the IRS to do a complete audit of the two citizens. The IRS conducts the investigation and finds no nor has there been any irregularity, then the Prosecutor sends new submissions to the Central Bank of Ecuador, the Superintendency of Companies and finally the Financial Intelligence Unit, finding out now for the crime of money laundering. Assemblywoman parents Romo have been investigated for almost a year and have just been notified last month. Pesantez and his minions have spent a year "fishing" and found nothing irregular.
Pesántez For this it uses the time, resources and power of the prosecution, not to investigate or punish those who commit crimes but to carry out personal vendettas.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment