REASONS FOR BREACH VOTE NO!
A campaign of ideas and proposals
The consultation of the people is a mechanism that should be used responsibly and to deepen democracy, not to justify decisions contrary to the Constitution and its principles.
Through the consultation proposal the President exercises the executive branch, legislature, replacing the Council of Citizen Participation and appoint the judiciary. This concentration is exactly the opposite of what is good for democracy.
The query contains a speech where do we choose between security and rights, as if they were opposites. The challenge is to live safely without waive the rights.
We are aware that the crisis we face in security and justice is extremely serious. Precisely for this reason, the responsibility for our present and future solutions must be comprehensive and profound. This consultation delayed the change process of justice to return to the vicious circle of political interference in other governments have claimed.
When rupture was born and we were wondering about the practices that had to be broken, Febres Cordero criticize harshly and their tanks before the Court. We were relentless against Gutierrez and his Pichi Court. Therefore we can not repeat past mistakes.
policy is not an act of faith, what is revolutionary in our country is to build institutions for the present and the future beyond the political whims.
For these and other reasons resulting from global analysis of the consultation and the content of each question, as rupture we decided to separate the country and respond NO in the referendum.
Our campaign will be communicate, analyze, discuss , but we know that the consultation will not solve the real problems of Ecuador and seems irresponsible to spend $ 30 billion in questions about subjects that did not require this procedure. Accordingly, as rupture, devolveresmos public funds to our organization by the National Electoral Council.
The Ecuador needs a coherent policy, so we invite all political actors, who like us, do this campaign with arguments and proposals without public money.
0 comments:
Post a Comment