Why Is One Of My Malawi Shuddering

Analysis of the Popular Consultation. QUESTION 1. Beautiful custom

Question 1.

Do you agree to amend paragraph 9 of Article 77 of the Constitution incorporated a clause which prevents the expiration of preventive detention when it has been caused by the person on trial and punish allowing unreasonable obstacles in the administration of justice by judges, judges, prosecutors, experts or servers subsidiary bodies of the judiciary, as defined in Annex 1?
This question raises the apparent need to curb the benefits of the revocation of custody when the abuse comes from the procesados y servidores judiciales.

Esta pregunta es innecesaria e incompleta. Es innecesaria porque el Código de Procedimiento Penal vigente ya regula la prohibición de la caducidad de la prisión preventiva cuando ha sido atribuida a maniobras desleales del procesado, pues el inciso sexto del artículo 169 señala que:

“No se considerará, por consiguiente, que ha excedido el plazo de caducidad de prisión preventiva cuando el imputado, por cualquier medio, ha evadido, retardado, evitado o impedido su juzgamiento mediante actos orientados a provocar la caducidad de la prisión preventiva”.
Además, el mismo Art. 169 del Código de Procedimiento Penal, y el Art. 108.7 del Code of Judicial Function, and establish liability and sanctions for judicial officers in the process no longer invalidate the detention.
Moreover, although the question repeated exceptions to the expiration of the remand for conduct of the defendant or the judicial authorities are regulated, is incomplete because it does not foresee the complexity of the case exception, which is fed widespread in the doctrine of the European and Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
So what is the intent of the question? None the less in terms of regulatory reform. Thus a question of this weight, which interferes with rights and guarantees of due process, merely part of penal populism, that strategy that dismantles rights under the security discourse in the symbolic power of measuring underground popularity.

Will My Baby Get Nicotine Withdrawal

: give books and poems by the World Book Day. The Consultation

My gift: a piece that I like much of a book by A. Mastreta:
"... I promise to live with intensity and joy, not to give in to the abyss of love, nor fear of it falling over me, nor forgotten, even by the torment of a thwarted passion.
I promise to remember, to know my mistakes, to bless my outbursts. I pledge to forgive the dropouts, not to neglect anything of everything that touches me, dazzle me, I shall break, me happy. Long live
promise, long patience, long stories. And nothing will shorten that to happen, or pain, or ecstasy, that when I am old and delight have the detailed history of my days "
(Mastreta, No eternity as mine).

Pastor's Banquet Invitation

Vodka Will Make Men As Impotent

Popular:

REASONS FOR BREACH VOTE NO!

A campaign of ideas and proposals

The consultation of the people is a mechanism that should be used responsibly and to deepen democracy, not to justify decisions contrary to the Constitution and its principles.

Through the consultation proposal the President exercises the executive branch, legislature, replacing the Council of Citizen Participation and appoint the judiciary. This concentration is exactly the opposite of what is good for democracy.

The query contains a speech where do we choose between security and rights, as if they were opposites. The challenge is to live safely without waive the rights.

We are aware that the crisis we face in security and justice is extremely serious. Precisely for this reason, the responsibility for our present and future solutions must be comprehensive and profound. This consultation delayed the change process of justice to return to the vicious circle of political interference in other governments have claimed.

When rupture was born and we were wondering about the practices that had to be broken, Febres Cordero criticize harshly and their tanks before the Court. We were relentless against Gutierrez and his Pichi Court. Therefore we can not repeat past mistakes.

policy is not an act of faith, what is revolutionary in our country is to build institutions for the present and the future beyond the political whims.

For these and other reasons resulting from global analysis of the consultation and the content of each question, as rupture we decided to separate the country and respond NO in the referendum.

Our campaign will be communicate, analyze, discuss , but we know that the consultation will not solve the real problems of Ecuador and seems irresponsible to spend $ 30 billion in questions about subjects that did not require this procedure. Accordingly, as rupture, devolveresmos public funds to our organization by the National Electoral Council.

The Ecuador needs a coherent policy, so we invite all political actors, who like us, do this campaign with arguments and proposals without public money.